Editorial

 

50th issue of News & Views

 

There are many warm words in the early pages of this number about the achievement of 50 issues of News & Views, so I shall add little to them here. I shall just say that I share the admiration others have expressed for my predecessors (and not least for Peter Horne, still my co editor) on account of all the determination, hard work and good judgement that they have deployed over the years to make this achievement possible.

 

The costs of postage normally limit us to an issue of 24 pages plus cover. Your Branch Committee debated whether to celebrate the newsletter’s jubilee by splashing out on a cover in colour, or by authorising a weightier issue up to the next postal threshold. Sensibly the Committee opted for substance over glamour; so here you have a jubilee issue of 44 pages, whose weight I hope you will measure not only in grams but in stimulation and enjoyment.  Not only do we have jubilee messages from the President of the Chartered Institute, from former editors and from a fraternal publisher interarb; we also have more of the features you normally expect: more news, more trailers, more articles, more pages from our Chairman – and even twice as many puzzles! So, good reading! And to make the editors' joy complete, write in to us with your own views on this or that.

 

The 5-year plan

 

In the last issue my editorial focused on the Chartered Institute’s strategic review of September 2000, which led to the Council’s ―endorsement of a 5-year programme of change. I said I would invite Headquarters to give us their view on progress. This I have done. The response from the Chairman of the Executive Board is printed on page 21. Achievement so far is impressive, I think you will agree. The main items missing from Mr Campbell’s list seem to be –

 

l     improvement in arrangements for pupillage – but the President told us in person in September (page 13) that reducing the numbers awaiting pupillage was his personal target for the year;

l     investigating members’ concern over constricted panel membership and the limitation of appointments to too small a circle – the continuing perception that the Institute does not help the generality of members as well as it could to secure appointments is a matter that our Branch Chairman mentions in his Chairman’s page immediately before this editorial;

l     providing funds for tutors;

l     encouraging young arbitrators;

l     reviewing continuous professional development (CPD);

l     encouraging systematic delegation of tasks to Branches, in accordance with Branch business plans;

 

l     increasing the involvement of the Institute in policymaking in the UK and internationally – though, as is recognised on page 23, the Institute, together with European Branch, has seized the opportunity offered by the European Commission to comment on their consultative paper on alternative dispute resolution (ADR); and

l     developing a research capability.

 

It is fair of the Executive Board Chairman to point out that we are still only just over two years into a five year programme. I am sure we all wish the Executive Board, the Council and the staff of the Institute well in progressing these tasks during the remaining period.  I am also sure that many of us are prepared to offer our help with the outstanding work, should that be of use.  We shall be encouraged to receive further bulletins from time to time.

 

In the meantime if any of you, our readers, have any comments or suggestions to offer, do send them in, and we shall pass them on as appropriate.       

                                                       

Roger Clarke