Jubilee messages

from former editors and co-editors

 

Dennis James

Francis Miller

Peter Horne

David Bailey

Charles Stimpson

Publishers of Interarb

from Dennis James, Founder Editor – edited issues 1 to 16 (1986 - 1991)

IN THE BEGINNINGS

When the Branch was founded in 1982 two things were obvious. The first was that the discipline of arbitration was rapidly growing, as would be the Branch Membership, and the second was that there was a necessity that a means of communication was forged between the Branch Members and the Committee. A newsletter was a necessity.

In 1978 I had been through such a learning curve with the setting up of a Branch of the Institution of Civil Engineers in the South East of England and, as such, was the first editor of the ICE Newsletter. This was printed in the deep blue of the ICE.

Having been elected (i.e. being the only candidate) as Editor of the CIArb South East Branch Newsletter, I followed exactly the same format as the ICE, but chose the deep CIArb green for the communication.

The first edition of the CIArb Newsletter was in September 1986. Initially I had great difficulty in obtaining copy for publication. My first solution was to endeavour to write the most provocative editorial that I could. Indeed at times this possibly verged upon being libellous. My intention was to stimulate replies and comments.

Unfortunately the CIArb members were very gentlemanly and did not respond, despite my having repeated tilts at the various professions (mainly the lawyers!). I also desecrated Headquarters and Council, but unfortunately the response was rather limited. As an alternative approach I wrote to each of the officers prior to every issue and asked them for their reports. This blackmail appeared to have more success, and in time we were able to build up a flow of news and information.

Technical articles were more difficult to obtain, but a few of the Branch stalwarts were most helpful in that direction. Perhaps I should point out that at that time the production of the Journal was a solo effort on my part. I typed the copy, took it to the printers, and even put the copy in envelopes and stamped them. As a matter of interest I learnt from the printers that, had they sent out the documents, then I would have had to have paid VAT on the postage, which could have been a financial burden as we were not at that time VAT registered.

I handed over the editorship with Issue 17 in January 1992 to Francis Miller who, not only quite correctly changed the title to Arbitration News and Views, but was able to attract a wider circle of contributors.

Thinking back over the years, I believe that the effort of the Newsletter was very worthwhile and the publicity we obtained with other Branches and Headquarters certainly put our Branch on the map as a National Branch Leader. The quality and standard of the Journal improved issue by issue up to its present high standards.

from Francis Miller – edited issues 17-22 (1992 - 1993)

With the publication of the fiftieth issue this is a good time for looking back to the beginning and retracing the events which have led us to this point, but there is a better case for looking at the future - the next fifty issues.

Who cares now about all the struggles, the upsets and faltering as we lurched progressively forward from those first early steps? All is now overtaken by the fact that the Newsletter was created, it survived and it is still going from strength to strength. The enduring evidence is set in the publication of the bound and indexed volume of all the issues from 1986 to 2000. There one will find all the history, and the readers of that publication can guess with fair accuracy the background scenes which brought it all about.

Since that bound volume of those first 43 issues, there have been another 6 issues published; and this, the fiftieth, will be the seventh. Time moves relentlessly on and with it also moves the ever increasing contribution that Arbitration News and Views is making. The Newsletter, has a developing mass all of its own; and with the continuing support of both contributors and readers, the contents will fully justify its title.

In looking forward, I am hoping that we shall not have to wait until the next millennium before we get a further bound volume with an index. I am hoping that there will be a forward plan to bind and index this important contribution to the ever-developing field of dispute resolution which Arbitration News and Views provides.

from Peter Horne – edited issues 30 to 35 (1996 - 1998) and co edited issues 46 to 50 (2001 - 2003)

As evidence that some people do actually read News & Views, I responded to an advert in issue 28, asking for another pair of hands to help with various tasks.  Two issues later I was saddled with the responsibility of collating the entire document and ensuring that all copy was received on time and events properly reported – all summed up by the title of Editor.

Fortunately, my predecessor was Paul Darrington (editor issues 23 to 29), now sadly no longer with us, who passed over a superb system, retaining an interest on the editorial board in liaison with other branches and arranging the printing. Derek Jerram had been assisting Paul throughout his period as editor, and continued until issue 43 in producing a ‘legal comment’ column. Both were invaluable in producing News & Views during my period as editor.

I recall having an enjoyable time as editor – even when having to report on meetings when I could not find a volunteer (willing or blackmailed). Unfortunately, my health was deteriorating steadily, and I was hospitalised in early 1998 and unable to work for the remainder of the year.  Luckily, Paul Darrington was available and stepped into the void and, with the help of Francis Miller, produced issue 36 which (I think) was on a par with all others and continued with issues 37 and 38 when relieved by David Bailey.

After resolving my health problems, I returned to assist on the new board commencing with issue 46.  This board had strength in its varied background and experience but is now looking for an additional member with particular responsibility for finding meeting reporters.

The success of News & Views must be self-evident in its longevity. Our job currently is made all the easier by the sound foundations placed by our predecessors.

from David Bailey – edited issues 38 to 45 (1999 - 2002)

I had the privilege of acting as editor for 8 editions of News & Views. I took over from Paul Darrington, whose death was a great loss to News & Views and of course to the Branch and Institute.

Paul was a difficult act to follow; but in my last year I had the advantage of being chairman and editor for the Branch, which meant that as chairman I could exert considerable influence on the editor without the slightest fear of any reprisal.

Editing News & Views was a most enjoyable experience; but I cannot describe the amount of work involved, and my best wishes go out to the present editors in their ongoing endeavours.  I hope to be able to write a further piece for the 100th anniversary of News & Views.

from Charles Stimpson – co edited issues 46 to 48 (2001 - 2002)

Having just passed the necessary entry exam in late 2000, I found our Chairman quickly engaged my services onto the editorial subcommittee of News & Views, and thankfully into the more experienced company of Roger and Peter. The journal is a simple but carefully crafted booklet, and I enjoyed contributing pieces as scribe / note taker at several of the Branch meetings, whose speakers are varied and entertaining, providing a great insight into other types of professional work, besides my own. Branch meetings are also friendly, and as a newcomer I felt welcomed.

The 50th number is a noble tribute to the predecessor editors and contributors of the journal, and I hope my own and future contributions will be adequate to ensure the 100th edition in due course.

From the publisher of Interarb

The history (and prehistory) of civilisation is the coming together of people. Either permanent groupings (tribes, towns, cities) or exchanges between groups (exploration, trade). It is a truism that where two or more people are gathered together there will, eventually, be a dispute. Disputes are part of society. They can, though, be a most corrosive (if not worse) part of it. So ‘for the good of the whole’ it is better that disputes are settled with finality.

So much are truisms familiar to us all. A wise man would not, though, wish to live in a society without disputes. Such a society would be some totalitarian bastardisation of what civilisation can be. A good society will strive not so much to prevent disputes (though it will do that, to a degree) as to ensure that disputes are settled in a way that ‘sticks’. Which is all a pompous introduction to some statements about the real value of  News & Views.

An unassuming little A5 booklet, only some (typically) 24 black and white pages, and only appearing every few months. It has though a print run into the four figures, thus rivalling the ‘international glossies’: breaking the ‘eight hundred barrier’ for an arbitration journal is something that few achieve (at least for circulation, though readerships may obviously be higher).

But its key feature, over some fifty issues, has been the diversity, the provocativeness of the contributions it has contained. In that it has done much to ensure that disputes have been better resolved. Not only disputes in the large, but also ‘our’ disputes, disputes about arbitral practice and procedure. It may be hyperbolic (but birthday greetings are not the time for feint praise) to say that the present luxuriance of arbitration (especially international arbitration) in England owes much, if not more, to News & Views: whilst too many of us had chins metaphorically glued to breast bones whilst innocently whistling – like a bunch of schoolboys caught next to an empty washing line that had contained matron's smalls – it was News & Views that carried a thriving debate, touching issues that some almost certainly thought should not receive the oxygen of publicity.  Those ‘disputes’ are behind us, but arbitration is the better for them, better for the ways they were explored by our editors.

Indeed arbitration – and arbitration far, far more widely than in the ‘South East’? – is the better for what News & Views in its unassuming (but influential) little ways has contributed.  Bonne continuation!


Michael Chapman
Publisher,

interarb, France